Skip navigation
Subscribe to Packaging Digest
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

U.K. cigarette packaging debate heats up

Linda Casey -- Packaging Digest, 2/2/2010 4:28:57 PM

 

"Now that we've banned advertising and will soon see an end to attractive displays in shops, the only remaining method of advertising tobacco is the packaging," said Andy Burnham, U.K. Secretary of State for Health, in a statement made Monday


In this statement, Burham announced a new tobacco control strategy titled, ‘‘A Smokefree Future.' This strategy aims to halve the number of smokers, from 21 to 10 percent of the population in the U.K. by 2020.


The U.K. Department of Health says the new strategy builds upon the agency's earlier program ‘Smoking Kills.' A Smokefree Future also resurrects an old idea from that 1998 Smoking Kills program: Consideration of a ban against use of branding and marketing on cigarette packaging. 


Denis Campbell, in an article he penned for the Guardian in 2008, noted that a government mandate for plain packaging of cigarettes "could be the most powerful tool yet unleashed in the war on smoking."


In a response to the renewed threat to possibly mandate plain packaging, British American Tobacco issued its own statement citing how plain packaging could actually encourage availability of tobacco. "Plain packs would require no complicated logos, colors or designs to be copied-making it far easier and cheaper for criminals to flood the market with mass produced fake products for sale on street corners," the international tobacco group remarks. "And the perverse outcome of this is that cigarettes will become more accessible to young people and the sections of society that these regulations seek to protect."


The group also stated that such a brand would breach governments' obligations to help protect intellectual property rights. "Brands are valuable corporate assets and the Government risks breaching various legal obligations relating to intellectual property rights, international trade and European law," notes British American Tobacco. "If the Government tries to introduce plain packaging it will have a huge fight on its hands."


If a ‘plain packaging' mandate was to come to fruition, the group opined, it could have wide reaching implications. The final comment made in the statement made by British American Tobacco is, "It [the plain packaging mandate] would also set a dangerous precedent for brands owned and used by other industries."

RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email
Talkback
Canon Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
Related Content
  • Blogs
  • Photos

Tom Marin

Building Brands

Tom Marin, Brands & Branding Editor, GAM
April 23, 2010
Let’s just say when you see a great ad it’s tough not to smile
Cargill had a big task in front of them when they set out to create advertising...
More

Dennis Salazar

Common Sense and Sustainability

Dennis Salazar
April 21, 2010
Mainstream Media Not Very Sustainable on the Environment
With another Earth Day upon us and especially with this being the 40th anniversary...
More

Tom Marin

Building Brands

Tom Marin, Brands & Branding Editor, GAM
April 16, 2010
You’ll never look at dinner the same way
Most of the blogs that I write fall into two camps. They are either how to...
More

David Bellm

Eye on Packaging

David Bellm
April 15, 2010
Wine packaging: The rare case where organic brands are cheaper
Organic foods and drinks cost more. That’s a given, right? Not so fast....
More

VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscriptions   |   RSS
 © 2010 Canon Communications LLC. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy