Sustainable packaging: KMG Digital introduces 100% recyclable packaging for its optical media products

-- Packaging Digest, 5/24/2010 12:08:01 PM

KMG Digital announces the introduction of Eco-Friendly optical media packaging that removes over 98% of all plastic packaging components from the consumer waste stream. The new Eco-Friendly packaging is paper construction and delivers 100% recyclable storage containers that do not include polypropylene or polystyrene plastics. To further expand on this green initiative, KMG Digital has also reduced the environmental footprint of its optical media packaging for Kodak-branded recordable CDs and DVDs by using soy-based inks for package printing. KMG is the worldwide licensee for Kodak-branded optical blank media products and accessories.

According to Mike Golacinski, KMG Digital President and CEO, "Many competitive products are boasting about reduction of plastics while not addressing the fundamental issue, which is to eliminate plastic packaging that produces greenhouse gases and clogs our landfills. We've found a way to bring environmentally sustainable packaging to the category in a cost-efficient manner."

KMG Digital is launching 10 new Kodak-branded Eco-Friendly packs:

CD-R 80 10 Paper Box Pack with 10 paper Sleeves - $3.99
CD-R 80 25 Paper Can Pack - $6.99
CD-R 80 50 Paper Can Pack - $13.99

DVD-R 10 Paper Box Pack with 10 paper Sleeves - $4.99
DVD-R 25 Paper Can Pack - $9.99
DVD-R 50 Paper Can Pack - $19.99

DVD+R 10 Paper Box Pack with 10 paper Sleeves - $4.99
DVD+R 25 Paper Can Pack - $9.99
DVD+R 50 Paper Can Pack - $19.99

DVD+R DL 10 Paper Box Pack with 10 paper Sleeves - $9.99

Brad Yeager, Director of Marketing, states, "Paper and cardboard are the most efficient materials to recycle. Plastics are one of the least efficient due to sorting, overseas transportation and re-melting. Many municipalities do not have the ability to recycle all the different types of plastic. Approximately 1400 tons of polystyrene are deposited into landfills every day. KMG Digital wants to do our part to decrease waste."

SOURCE: KMG Digital

.

Talkback

» Submit Feedback

After reading the above article titled “Paper media packaging for Kodak licensee removes 98% of plastic,” I believe that KMG Digital’s Mike Golacinski may be misinformed. Speaking on behalf of a plastic thermoformer, we are disappointed when we stumble across the proclamation of misinformed or unsubstantiated environmental claims about plastic packaging. Therefore, I would like to take this opportunity to analyze these anti-plastic environmental claims with hopes of facilitating an honest dialogue about packaging materials and sustainability. Only when we understand the reality of the situation will we begin to make more informed packaging material procurement selections that are based on science, and not ambiguous claims.

Consider the following statement: “Many competitive products are boasting about reduction of plastics while not addressing the fundamental issue, which is to eliminate plastic packaging that produces greenhouse gases and clogs our landfills…”

First of all, the assumption that plastic packaging produces greenhouse gases is misplaced. Almost every product and service produces GHG equivalents during production and throughout the life cycle. Let’s clarify what “greenhouse gases” mean:

According to the 2009 report released by the U.S. Global Change Research Program, the largest factor contributing to global warming is increased greenhouse gas emissions such as carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, water vapor, halocarbons, and soot. Therefore, when making claims of GHG emissions, it is helpful to indicate which chemical you are referring to, as each packaging material procurement and conversion process releases different GHG equivalents, based on the methods used.

In addition, not only should GHG equivalents generated be consideration when procuring packaging materials, but other metrics, like water discharges, air pollutants, and OSHA carcinogens should be taken into account.

While I have not been able to find the necessary data to do an apples-to-apples comparison between the GHG equivalents emitted during the production of 1,000 lbs of fiber-based packaging materials versus those emitted during the production of 1,000 lbs of a common packaging polymer, the most recent Toxics Release Inventory data released by the U.S. E.P.A. explains the following:

…Pulping processes are the pulp and paper sector’s primary source of air emissions and water discharges of pollutants. Chemical pulping (to digest a material, typically wood, into its fibrous cellulose constituents) is the most widely used pulping method (85% in 1991). Kraft chemical pulping, an alkaline process whose active components are primarily sodium sulfide and sodium hydroxide, is the sector’s greatest source of air pollutants.

…For many paper grades, bleaching follows pulping. Traditional chlorine bleaching generates chlorinated byproducts—chloroform, dioxins, furans—that pose particular environmental concerns for their persistence, bioaccumulatability, and toxicity.

…Methanol or “wood alcohol,” is the chemical with the largest TRI releases (principally air emissions) from this sector. Methanol is formed in the chemical pulping process as wood chips are “cooked” to dissolve the lignin bonds that hold cellulose fibers together…Methanol in air reacts to form formaldehyde, contributing to air pollution…119.8 million pounds of methanol were released from the pulp and paper sector in 1996.

…Coated and laminated paper products are also associated with significant reporting of releases and other waste management of TRI chemicals…Pollutants associated with various coating materials and processes have included emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and discharges of wastewater containing solvents, colorants, and other contaminants.

…Pulp and paper releases…of chemicals designated as OSHA carcinogens totaled
18.9 million pounds in 1996. The large majority (17.7 million pounds) was released to air. Three of the top 15 chemicals for on- and off-site releases in the pulp and paper sector are OSHA carcinogens: chloroform, acetaldehyde, and formaldehyde. These three chemicals accounted for 16.4 million pounds of the 18.9 million pounds of OSHA. The OSHA carcinogens with the next highest on- and off-site releases were dichloromethane (746,000 pounds) and asbestos (571,000 pounds).

…[In summary,] The pulp and paper sector reported a total of 1.60 billion pounds of TRI chemicals in production-related waste for 1996

Please visit: US EPA to download the most recent TRI report for the paper and pulp industries(Pack Digest won't allow me to include the direct link).

Second, the assumption that plastic packaging “clogs our landfills” is also misinformed: According to the Container and Packaging Municipal Solid Waste data released by the U.S. E.P.A. in 2007, 52% of landfills are comprised of paper products. In addition, in the MSW report released in 2008, “paper packaging/other paper packaging” has no recovery data (“Neg.”), which implies that paper packaging does not often get recycled, contrary to popular belief. Please visit:US EPA (Pack Digest won't allow me to include the direct link).

On page 5 of this document you will find a break-down of the different paper products that are recycling in America: as this table illustrates, the high recovery rates for paper are attributed primarily to newspapers (87.6% recovery) and corrugated boxes (76.6%).

I apologize if the tone of this post is a bit aggressive; I am not trying to make anyone uncomfortable I just wanted to take advantage of this public knowledge exchange medium with hopes of elevating the dialogue around issues pertaining to packaging materials and sustainability. While there is a lot of confusion surrounding the sustainability of plastic packaging, I am confident that the science will catch up, the dialogues will evolve, and packaging professionals will begin making more informed packaging decisions based on sound science and not marketing claims.

In a nut shell: The anti-plastic mentality conveyed in the statements made by representatives of KMG Digital is unfounded in the scientific community and to use it to promote paper over plastics is not good for any company involved in packaging from an economic, social, political, and environmental perspective.

Chandler Slavin - 2010-4-6 11:50:08 EDT

» Submit Feedback

Featured Company

SATO

SATO is a pioneer and leading global provider of integrated Automatic Identification and Data Collection solutions that leverage barcode and RFID technologies. SATO manufactures innovative, reliable auto-identification systems and offers complete... more
Bosch Packaging Technology

Bosch Packaging Technology, Inc. is one of the world's leading suppliers of packaging machinery. Our diverse portfolio of packaging machines, including the well known Doboy brand, includes robotic automation with pick & place robots (delta robots)... more
A-B-C Packaging Machine Corporation

For over 69 years, A-B-C has led the industry with innovative case erectors, packers, sealers, palletizers, depalletizers and more-- built to save money and reduce labor on the packaging line. Today, our work continues as we develop machines to... more
Adept Technology

Adept Technology is a global, leading provider of intelligent robotics systems that enable customers to achieve precision, speed, quality and productivity in their assembly, handling, packaging, testing and other automated processes. Adept's... more
VISION RESEARCH

Vision Research designs and manufactures high-speed digital imaging systems used in applications including defense, automotive, engineering, science, medical research, industrial manufacturing and packaging, sports and entertainment, and digital... more
Shibuya Hoppman Corporation

Shibuya Hoppmann, a leading systems integrator, effectively responds to your needs using our innovative approaches towards technology, quality, reliability, experience and customer service. We want to be your preferred packaging machinery... more
Plastic Ingenuity

Plastic Ingenuity provides custom solutions for your unique thermoformed packaging needs for the food, retail, cell phone, medical, cosmetic, and other industries. Offering a wide variety of materials, including bio materials such as PLA, PSM, and... more
Wayne Automation Corporation

Through innovation and experience, Wayne Automation has developed a comprehensive line of packaging equipment built for reliability and long system life. Our product line includes: Case Erectors, Sealers, Partition Inserters, Tray Formers... more
Glue Dots International

Founded in 1995, Glue Dots International revolutionized the adhesives industry with pressure sensitive Glue Dots Brand Adhesive Products. Located in New Berlin, Wisconsin, Glue Dots holds several patents and continues to develop new, efficient... more
Diagraph, An ITW Company

Diagraph offers world-class marking, inkjet coding, and labeling systems for your RFID and product identification needs. Our product line includes a diverse line of industrial ink jet solutions including: small character continuous ink jet coding... more
Cognex Corporation

Cognex Corporation is the world's leading provider of vision systems, vision software, vision sensors, industrial ID readers and surface inspection systems used in manufacturing automation. Cognex helps companies improve product quality, eliminate... more
ID Technology

ID Technology (IDT), a division of Pro Mach, is a manufacturer and integrator of labeling, coding, and marking systems and solutions. With 17 regional facilities, IDT provides responsive service and support to fit our customers individual needs... more
Advanced Poly-Packaging, Inc.

that are fast, simple and money-saving! High quality poly bags, tabletop & production baggers and conveyors, scales and parts counters. Mail order, many foods, medical/pharmaceutical and more... more