Subscribe to Packaging Digest
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

Lightweighting has limits. Are we there yet?

John Kalkowski, Editorial Director -- Packaging Digest, 6/1/2010 3:46:00 PM

Bottled water lightweightingOver the last several years, companies have made huge strides in producing more sustainable packaging simply by lightweighting or downgauging their product. Along with increased recycling, this has been the low-hanging fruit of the sustainability movement. Now, British journalist Guy Montague-Jones writes that packaging may be approaching the practical limits to lightweighting.

Downgauging seems such an obvious method to lessen packaging’s impact on the environment and the bottom line. In the bottled water industry, for example, the gram weight of 0.5 liter single-serve bottles has been reduced as much as 30 percent. That translates into significant material savings, less energy use and lower transport costs. We have also seen the migration of hot-fill foods and beverages from heavier materials such as glass jars and bottles to PET containers. One reason that flexible packaging continues to enjoy rapid growth is the source reduction it offers over many other types of packaging.

Advances in design have bolstered container strength in minimalist designs, and the barrier properties of materials have improved shelf life. With advances in technology, packagers have been able to reduce the number of layers in laminated structures. Meanwhile, the use of barrier coatings could help further reduce the weight of laminated packaging.

However, if packaging is reduced too much, it can fail in its primary role of protecting the product through the distribution chain. As Britain’s Industry Council on Packaging and the Environment (Incpen) points out: “Inadequate packaging is usually far worse for the environment than over-packaging, because 10 to15 times more energy and materials are locked up in household goods and food than in the packaging around them.” Incpen says if an under-packaged item is spoiled or damaged, that  can waste 100 percent of the resources used to produce both the contents and its packaging, and all of the fuel used to distribute it.

Euromonitor, an international market research group, contends there are still substantial opportunities. Their lead researcher has been quoted as saying: “Even for pack types where lightweighting has gone as far as possible for the moment, technological advancements … are likely to give future scope for lightweighting.” This might be accomplished through use of new nanomaterials or further weight reductions in containers using materials such as metals or glass.

Hopefully , U.S. packagers are considering this eventuality and preparing for the next phase of improving packaging sustainability.

Photo by miras

.
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email
Talkback
Related Content

No related content found.

»MORE

Canon Resource Center

Featured Company


Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
Related Content
  • Blogs
  • Photos

David Bellm

Eye on Packaging

David Bellm
June 29, 2010
Nice chocolate packaging - feel the love!
It seems like products that evoke the most passion tend to get the biggest feast...
More

David Bellm

Eye on Packaging

David Bellm
June 14, 2010
Packaging design: Great typography leads to great designs
With the prominent role that photography and color choices have on the visual...
More

Jack Mans

Pack Rat

Jack Mans
June 10, 2010
A man's got to know his limitations - so does a company
My main job at Packaging Digest is writing packaging line stories, most of which I...
More

Dennis Salazar

Common Sense and Sustainability

Dennis Salazar
June 7, 2010
“Reusable” Packaging is Bigger than Expected
On January 9th I wrote a post on this blog about what I saw to be a trend in the...
More

VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Advertisement
Qpack ad mkt module
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscriptions   |   RSS
 © 2012 UBM Canon. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy