Skip navigation
Subscribe to Packaging Digest
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email

U.S. business groups blast Australia's law requiring plain packaging for tobacco products

Posted by Lisa McTigue Pierce -- Packaging Digest, 11/16/2011 8:18:04 AM

 

[ ProQuest Information & Learning • 2011-11-16 ] 


The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, the National Assn of Manufacturers, the Emergency Committee for American Trade, the U.S. Council for International Business, the National Foreign Trade Council, the U.S-ASEAN Business Council and the TransAtlantic Business Dialogue on Nov. 12, 2011, issued the following statement concerning legislation that has been passed by the Australian Senate that mandates the plain packaging of all tobacco products:


"As we noted on June 1 of this year in a Joint Statement, Australia's plain packaging proposal will violate Australia's international trade obligations and undermine the rules-based international trading system, without advancing public-health objectives.


"Now with the passage of the plain packaging legislation by the Australian Senate, we are reiterating our deep concerns given the proposal appears certain to be enacted into law. Some of us were able to relay these concerns directly to the Prime Minister in a meeting related to the APEC Leaders Summit in Hawaii. We noted to the Prime Minister that the passage of this legislation is a draconian assault on the legal rights of intellectual property owners and is void of regulatory best practice considerations.

 

"Australia's government has legislated in a way that has no compelling evidentiary basis that it will actually advance public health while it will facilitate opportunities for counterfeiting and other forms of illicit activity. The regulation of industry should not be arbitrary and always be based on regulatory best practice. Eviscerating the rights of intellectual property holders is not a solution and we will continue to oppose this and similar measures vigorously. There are alternatives, but unfortunately Australia's government chose a path that invites new assaults on the rights of intellectual property owners that have appropriately been protected both in domestic law and by international agreements.


"As representatives of American and international business, we rely on the rules-based international trade framework and its supporters to sustain economic growth, employment, innovation and prosperity. Furthermore, we reiterate that protecting intellectual property rights and advancing public health are mutually reinforcing."

 


.
RSS
Reprints/License
Print
Email
Talkback
Related Content

No related content found.

Sponsored Links
Canon Resource Center

Featured Company

Most Recent Resources

Advertisement
Related Content
  • Blogs
  • Photos

Tom Szaky

Green Terratory

Tom Szaky
November 10, 2011
Recyclebank + Greenopolis = bright future for package recycling
As recycling has gained ground and moved to the forefront of concern in the past...
More

Lisa McTigue Pierce

Digestibles

Lisa Pierce
November 2, 2011
Plastic additives headed for a ‘breakdown'?
“What we have here is a failure to communicate.” That famous line...
More

KC Boxbottom

Adventures in Packaging

KC Boxbottom
November 2, 2011
The case of the falling labels
He was sitting in my office when I got back. He was the packaging manager at a...
More

KC Boxbottom

Adventures in Packaging

KC Boxbottom
October 17, 2011
The case of the busted bar code
My phone’s bleat told me it was urgent. I answered it to find Johnny, one...
More

VIEW ALL BLOGS RSS

Advertisement
Qpack ad mkt module
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscriptions   |   RSS
 © 2012 UBM Canon. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy