Subscribe to Packaging Digest

The Gray about Green

June 18, 2009

“There is no black and white in green, and the gray in sustainable packaging is growing daily.”

I may be paraphrasing a quote I first heard some time ago at a green conference but I think the message is clear. For people who want and need absolutes such as yes/no, good/bad, right/wrong, etc., this relatively new area of sustainability can be frustrating and confusing.

Though we sometimes choose to highlight the humor in this almost daily dilemma with a cartoon such as Eco Ed or an occasional tongue in cheek blog post, but the problem is a serious one and the consequences potentially disastrous. That is why it is so important we all have to remain open to the possibility if not, likelihood, our own unique perspective may not be absolutely correct or absolutely incorrect.

With this in mind, I speed forward into the blogosphere thanks to John Kalkowski and David Bellm of Reed Business for this opportunity to write for them and the readers of Packaging Digest. The preface above is designed to let you know what to expect from me in future posts. In writing and presentation, I often refer to “common sense sustainability” and  to “eco-consistency” and over the course of time, my hope is to convince you that these two terms are not at all contrary and very much necessary for my two different passions of packaging and sustainability to co-exist.

A Few Gray Areas in Sustainable Packaging

There are many and they are almost sure to appear in future posts. Some of the most highly debated areas currently include:

  • Multi-layer packaging materials some are proposing for everything from milk to water to eliminate the “great menace to mankind” - plastic bottles. Please note the sarcasm in that quote.
  • PLA or polylactic acid – is it the solution to all of our packaging environmental problems or an option that is going to pollute the waste stream and lead millions of the world’s poor into starvation?
  • Plastics- what is biodegradable versus oxo-degradable and are either the right or best solution?

Another area that is near and dear to my own heart is the area of 100% PCW corrugated board. Some claim it is the worst thing that we can possibly do with our paper waste, others think it is the ideal solution for a fast growing problem.

My Own Thoughts on 100% PCW corrugated

To be completely candid, our company is best known for our Globe Guard 100% PCW corrugated boxes but please allow me to explain that we also offer 100% recycled (non-PCW) corrugated board, and standard (30-40%) recycled content board so we really have no ax to grind in one direction or the other. We are firm believers that the application needs to drive the packaging product selection and we will continue offering all three products and many variations of each, to be able to satisfy the great variety of applications that we come across.

It is also important to note that our position on 100% PCW does not come from the classroom, textbook or sitting in on a conference presentation, but from a combination of real world applications and dozens of field tests. I’m not sure this necessarily makes us more credible but I would like to think the scars and hair loss account for something.

Here is Where Common Sense Comes into Play

The price of paper waste has plummeted and in many areas there is a virtual glut of waste in search of a purpose. Not too long ago, compressed bales of corrugated and paper scrap were a source of revenue for some companies and now they are literally giving those same bales away to cover removal and transportation cost. If the trend continues, those same companies may soon have to pay to have their crushed and baled corrugated boxes removed from their docks and parking lots.

Why is this happening? Everyone with an interest in the environment is promoting recycling. Even the people who reduced the concept of sustainability from Wal-Mart’s original 7 R’s to a much more manageable 3 R’s (reduce, reuse, and recycle) will agree that recycling is a critical part of solving the waste problem because we simply cannot reduce and reuse fast enough or in sufficient volume to make those two options totally and completely effective.

At the same time, most people agree that as a society we may only be recycling as little as 30% of our recyclable paper waste so we can easily see where this garbage barge is headed. We have to come up with new and better ways to recycle, reprocess and reuse the corrugated and paper waste we all create. Using 100% PCW products, whenever possible, may not be the perfect environmental solution but it is a darn good one until we come up with a better option to protect the environment and a better use for the used paper and corrugated we are asking others to save from the waste stream.

Posted by Dennis Salazar on June 18, 2009 | Comments (10)

July 7, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Dennis Salazar commented:

Konstantin, This is a serious problem that unfortunately is not going away any time soon so it will undoubtedly be a regular topic on this and my own blog which you can access through our website www.salazarpackaging.com. If there is something specific you need, please feel free to contact me through the same. Thank you fo rteh commment. Dennis


July 6, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
KonstantinMiller commented:

Hello, can you please post some more information on this topic? I would like to read more.


June 25, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Rene Olivier commented:

Thank you for the article. I would like to add value to the multi-layer packaging materials section. We all know that you save for example 75% plastic when a milk sachet is used instead of a bottle. The same applies for other things like edible oil, water, wine, etc. The biggest problem is that it has never really been convenient to use this system as it always spills when you cut the sachet and it goes off sooner as it is exposed to air. Furthermore, your carbon footprint is lower for transportation as it takes less space, and bottles takes more energy to recycle than to make a new one, and the list goes on.. Yes, it's not the ultimate solution, but it is the most energy effective way of transporting liquid that I know of. To this end, Liquid Living has developed a system that makes the use of sachets convenient with a reusable tap dispenser system that can be mounted on a wall, placed in a refrigerator or on a table, etc. No air comes in contact with the liquid when the tap pierces the wall of the sachet so the product stays fresh longer. These two benefits opens op a whole new world for flexible packaging and promoting cost effective more environmentally friendly packaging. Go to liquidliving.biz for a video clip and more info on how this works.


June 23, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Dennis Salazar commented:

Please forgive me for this group thank you but I admit I fell behind on this important and enjoyable duty. My other, personal blog notifies me when I get a response so basically I was waiting for an message that was never going to come. Tom, Brad and Liz, I know you and you are all terrific people with a real care and concern for the environment. You are also very busy people so I thank you for taking time to read this post and for leaving your nice notes. Jen, Gail and Tele2002, I don't know you but I hope in time I will get to know you. I sincerely appreciate feedback from readers and especially from people on the design side of the business because you understand that balancing consumer eco perception and eco reality is never easy but always worthwhile. Thank you, Dennis


June 23, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Brad Shorr commented:

Hi Dennis, Your post is well timed, considering how consumer preferences are changing. E-commerce studies indicate that "conspicuous consumption" is giving way to "conspicuous conservation". Given this shift, it's surprising to see so many non-sustainable designs in primary and secondary packaging.


June 22, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Jen Pennington commented:

Thank you for the article. I am a designer who just had a great conversation with the paper supplier for my client and asked many of these same questions before I did anything. Am finding out all kinds of critical info. Some of the things I can do to make it more eco-friendly, and some I can't because the freshness of the product needs to be stable and dependable. it is definitely an education.


June 22, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Gail Nickel-Kailing commented:

Dennis, Thanks for the insights into sustainable packaging. Because packaging is one area where designers can influence consumer behavior, this is a critical area! Please check out my blog at WhatTheyThink Going Green: blogs.whattheythink.com/going-green/ It is there to collect information for printers, designers, and others in the graphic arts industry as they look to tread more lightly on the earth. Thanks!


June 22, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Tele2002 commented:

Great post Dennis, if we can get the designers to think green when they design the packaging the recycling won't be an after thought. tunicca.wordpress.com


June 19, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
Liz Amason commented:

Dennis, Thank you for your input. Yes, we have to do something and every option needs to be exercised, until the best one is finally pinned down. I am looking forward to your future posts and learning from your expertise. Liz Amason www.goodngreen.org


June 18, 2009
In response to: The Gray about Green
tom Nelson commented:

Great article Dennis. Remember that our corrugate waste is of great value to others !

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Ask the Experts ad
Advertisement
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscriptions   |   RSS
 © 2012 UBM Canon. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy