You will be redirected to your destination in 15 seconds.
Is your packaging wasting brand equity?
You as packaging designers manage some amazing feats: Simultaneously satisfy picky company leaders, fickle consumers and just plain crazy marketing people! You’re to be applauded–it’s a tough balancing act.
But I have something further for you to consider.
Your packaging, for the most part, has one use. What you create encompassed countless hours of meetings, designs, redesigns, factory tooling, wrestling matches and so on. It’s the front line of how your company’s products are seen in the world. It’s the final leg of the marathon that began with coming up with the idea for the product, perhaps testing it out with consumers, a final iteration chosen, then finished when someone decides to grab one of your products off the shelf and buy it.
But once the wrapping’s off, the bottle’s empty, the usefulness is done, that’s the end of the story. Some of it gets recycled. A lot of it doesn’t. Either way, all that brand equity you’ve put into the product is being wasted.
Say again?
Yes, when your packaging has no end of life solution, it’s clumsily being made for you, typically. Upcycling it into new products, which often directly uses the packaging in its original form in durable goods, retains brand equity for much longer then one use.
Designing for recyclability is a noble idea and one to be encouraged but, with a fairly limited range of materials, getting recycled in the U.S., it’s just not always possible. Or, in the case of food packaging, safe.
It’s time, both for the sake of saving resources (financial and environmental) to design for reuse where possible, and upcycling where it’s not.
In both cases, you’re benefitting the company due to extended presence in a consumer’s life, showing you’re out for more than just the sale, and you’ve done your part to keep waste out of the landfill, or worse, littering the ground.
Is there a downside to changing/expanding the way you think about packaging? It could cost more. It could take additional time and resources to implement. In the case of SunChips, it could cause consumer backlash.
Yes, sometimes we’re great at coming up with reasons why not. In this economy and any time really, I suggest we all get much less skilled in that arena, and start finding ways to say yes. To better packaging solutions that use less, save more, serve customers just as well, and live on beyond first use. It’s, in my opinion, the only sensible thing to do.
What are your thoughts? Being in the packaging design trenches, where are some opportunities for improvement? Where are the road bumps? Where are the emerging solutions? What are some recent successes to emulate, learn from? Jump into the comments, below.
Betsabe commented:
could you be so nice to explain what's 4p since there could be some outrdiess including me, who know 3p only. I think reading others blogs is a chance to understand what I've not known. and may give some examples for each strategies. I think IKEA partially uses the second.
Firdy commented:
最终仿制者们还是没能赢得最后的胜利it’s hard to say since they would have a different dfiinetion of success and didn’t invest so much in designing and technology development. For some products, technique is the first step followed by commercial thing. for some products, it is always commercial, such as cosmetics .
ManOnTheVillageGreen commented:
Whose leg are Santi (1 Sept) and Medjaly (26 Sept) trying to pull, and what private agenda are they following? Please don’t spoil an interesting site with such self-interested twaddle.
Medjaly commented:
To-the-point article. Here are clpoue thoughts. What excites me is that positive changes are emerging for the US private equity industry comparing to 2009-2010, supported by improved valuations and conditions in the capital markets. The PE industry has not been immune to the affects of the struggling economy, as 2009 results demonstrated, but performance to date in 2011 has been encouraging. Opportunities abound in the current environment given ample PE investors capital to deploy, and evidence that some of the best performing private equity vintage returns, historically, were made near the bottom of the cycle.
Santi commented:
To-the-point article. Here are clpuoe thoughts. What excites me is that positive changes are emerging for the US private equity industry comparing to 2009-2010, supported by improved valuations and conditions in the capital markets. The PE industry has not been immune to the affects of the struggling economy, as 2009 results demonstrated, but performance to date in 2011 has been encouraging. Opportunities abound in the current environment given ample PE investors capital to deploy, and evidence that some of the best performing private equity vintage returns, historically, were made near the bottom of the cycle.
Mike commented:
Consider partnering with terracycle.co.uk
ETsambouris commented:
Great article! I have learned a lot from this website today!
Dripnot, LLC commented:
I’m glad this article was posted. Consumers (and Mfgs.) need to be educated in this area even more! With our product being a ‘take-away’ item and then most likely thrown away, we were faced with the exact issues this article describes. The big issue looms however- take-away items are usually thrown away and not recycled, which is really tragic. In our journey to the perfect packaging material we decided to invent our own and will never look back. We hope others are ‘learning’ that this planet is in fact, very small and we all have a part to play taking care of it.
Ralph Machesky
CEO/President
Dripnot, LLC
www.dripnot.net
@dripnot
Alika commented:
First of all there should be conditions to recycle for everyone who wishes to do so. That’s potentially a bigger challenge. When designing package, there are concerns about in-store visibility - each brand wants to get the biggest shelf space. There could be some regulatory mechanisms in place (say, specifying the maximum sizes of packaging or packaging weight relative to product) to deal with such issues. AISE is a good example for Laundry and Cleaning products in Europe.
Recycler commented:
The easiest and most cost effective way to deal with non-recyclable material is to just not produce packaging using these materials.Another fact is the cost of packaging can be cut in half by using biodegradable cardboards and soy based coatings and ink for the printing
registergrl commented:
I have to comment on this due to that I agree with you on what your talking about recycling what gets me that in my state pennsylvania the city I live in gets picky about what kinds of materials can be recycled due to the trash dept saying so. I always have cardboard to recycle but they won’t take it. It even does from time to time have the recycle symbol but they don’t take it why not I always thought cardboard was recycleable. I don’t want to put my cardboard boxes in the landfill and feel bad everytime that I am contributing to the waste problem and the environment.So we need trash depts to take even cardboards too to recycle due to that it is a problem in our waste fills
Tuhin Verma commented:
Very interesting. This is an underlying problem for many marketers but usually ‘easy to get away without it’. I think what happened to SunChips is really amazing. The noise became a deterrent for consumption. Just imagine, the brand would not have dreamt about the loses accruing due to noise, forget the taste/price/availability/flavors/crunchiness. I think technology - technical knowledge in ecology - is a must for all food marketers especially brand managers / pruduct managers. Even more importantly the consumers. We should be the pillars of our society and responsible for generating awareness about the use of biodegradable packaging. What happens when they are done with their contribution of consumption? What happens to the silent package flown away or sewpt away like an orphan?
Concepts4Today commented:
Great Article, and if we can reduce in the process we will be that much better off. Concepts4Today’s Beverage Name Space promotes positive consumption which reduces risk of illness and disease from beverage confusion and eliminates excess waste in the environment with the ability to easily personalize a beverage bottle or container. www.concepts4today.yolasite.com
Vangyi commented:
While exploring the possibility of making packaging more useful after its primary function, I was a bit surprise by the lack of solution (and cooperation), so I am on a mission to “create” this opportunity. My new business venture is iScoopy Pal at iscoopy.com Hope that we’ll connect in the near future.
LD commented:
A lot of packaging would be kept longer for reuse if it actually did not have labeling on it - or the label (and adhesive) were easy to remove when done. And if bottles and other containers were shaped to allow for easier reuse - a bottle with a cap that could be interchanged with a mason jar lid or stopped with a wine cork. The more unique packaging is, the more wasteful it actually is.
JunkkMale commented:
No argument here - Junkk.com - designed-in reuse has been and is our mission, promoting such as REtie.co.uk in the process.
Kevin Southwick commented:
One of the best potential outcomes is that a package - primary or secondary, becomes what I call a “keeper box”. The design, structurally and or graphically is so compelling, the consumer cannot bear to throw it out, or recycle it in the conventional sense. Instead, it becomes a sewing kit or a small toy box or something - anything, other than garbage. I have been successful with this and keep it as an ongoing goal in my approach to packaging design.
















