ADVERTISEMENT
You will be redirected to your destination in 15 seconds.
Subscribe to Packaging Digest

The great green debate: Who's to blame?

June 22, 2012

To achieve maximum sustainability, whose contribution do you think matters the most: businesses, consumers, or our national and state governments? Rather than playing the blame game with any of these parties, I believe that this question should be approached more proactively. Problem identification is just the first step in any equation; it is the solution that ties the loose ends together. As a company that seeks to eliminate the idea of waste, TerraCycle is very much invested in developing and implementing solutions to remedy our environmental woes–but is one company enough?

TerraCycle’s collection and solution programs operate on a B2B (business-to-business) and B2C (business-to-consumer) basis to keep waste out of landfills and incinerators. This means that our efforts are based on a substantial amount of cooperation with our clientele; think of it as an interdependent network of environmental sustainability.

This network relies primarily on two components: eco-consciousness and initiative. Although contemporary society is becoming increasingly environmentally conscious, there are still those who will default to traditional (and often hazardous) methods of waste disposal. Privatized waste management systems work through incentive, not directive–in other words, environmental responsibility exists as a choice (and not as a rule) at the B2B and B2C level.

Even this limitation, however, is being solved for–at least in part. RGGI (Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative), for example, offers a mutually advantageous arrangement for reducing GHG emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. By implementing a mandatory, market-based-cap-and-trade system, RGGI is both economically and environmentally beneficial to its participants. Yet RGGI only covers GHG emissions from a limited amount of sources in nine states, and, although another step in the right direction, is by no means a standalone solution to sustainable waste management.

At the consumer level, individuals can choose to participate with programs such as TerraCycle Brigades to simultaneously collect waste and earn money. With products such as VELObill, an energy-tracking utility bill application developed by zerofootprint, consumers can make eco-friendly choices and save money. Even reducing, re-using, and recycling on an individual basis makes an impact, yet these processes still rely on eco-consciousness and initiative.

So, who is at the forefront of sustainability?

All of us are–or rather, all of us should be there, working together for a better (not to mention sustainable) future. Sustainability is a collective effort that brings us closer not only to our environment, but to one another as well. When companies incorporate recycled plastics into their products, when their consumers limit their purchases and carry them in reusable bags, when the government rewards both the public and private sectors for such eco-conscious decisions, then we see sustainability in action.

There are plenty of other ways to practice and encourage environmental sustainability, and on multiple levels–please feel free to share your favorites in the comments section below!

.

Posted by Tom Szaky on June 22, 2012 | Comments (2)
Industries: Sustainable Packaging

May 12, 2013
In response to: The great green debate: Who's to blame?
Aubree commented:

Last I checked Canada liked us. Why not acepct the oil from the Sands? I say no more blood for oil! Do business with Canada and get their oil!! That’s investing locally, too!What YOU say is nonsense! I would love an electric car, but I’m not paying $45,000 for one that only gets 27 miles on a charge! As usual, stupid government ideas will succeed in one thing: making it harder for the poor to earn a decent living.People for LCFS HATE the poor and want to see them starve to death.


May 12, 2013
In response to: The great green debate: Who's to blame?
June commented:

It’ll be interesting to see whtheer the BIFM network takes off; most successful networks have true engagement, with members adding content and taking part in discussions, rather than simply being spectators’. I set up a LinkedIn group Women in FM’ and find that although the group has hundreds of members, a very small percentage actually contribute. However, all those I speak to tell me they find the discussions useful. Should I concern myself with engaging the others, or be satisfied that they are getting what they need from the network?I wait with bated breath to see whtheer the BIFM network manages to create engagement with the majority of those who join.

POST A COMMENT
Display Name
captcha

Before submitting this form, please type the characters displayed above. Note the letters are case sensitive:

Advertisement
Advertisement
About Us   |   Advertising Info   |   Site Map   |   Contact Us   |   FREE Subscriptions   |   RSS
 © 2012 UBM Canon. All rights reserved.
Use of this Web site is subject to its Terms of Use | Privacy Policy