Author Gary Kestenbaum
Here are some fundamental suggestions for your consideration based on information and feedback I’ve obtained from the industry:
Review your safety team strategies. Evaluate what teams you have in place and consider where the involved members represent the necessary functions and knowledge to add the most value. Examples include:
Food processing and handling safety teams
- safety and quality continuous improvement teams
- food processing equipment preventive maintenance teams
- Raw material quality and safety sourcing teams
- HACCP plan teams
- Equipment safety teams
- Construction and maintenance safety teams
- Crisis team
- Post-crisis lessons-learned teams
- Training process and knowledge demonstration teams
Challenge yourself to consider where the gaps are. No one does everything perfectly. There are gaps everywhere and I assure you, there are experienced resources in your organization who can identify some of those gaps. Engage your resources and experts, and challenge them to identify gaps and risks. Then weigh the consequences, create a priority list factored by likelihood of occurrence and extent of harm. For example, there may be a low risk of pathogen contamination, but if that occurs, the harm to those humans affected is high.
2. COMMUNICATION and OWNERSHIP:
It is not always popular to be a champion for safety and quality change, and often it is frustrating. Make sure that the fruits of your labor are communicated with passion. Collect the data and develop presentations illustrating the impact of safety events to customer loyalty, impact to operations and other major impacts. Use examples culled from real-life situations and outcomes with which your audience can connect.
3. TRACE and RECALL PROCEDURES
Most trace and recall procedures include specific steps to take, but may be written with general language. For example, if you have some high speed state of the art production lines with all the latest accessories, the trace and recall may have been written to reflect those capabilities.
Or have they been? Maybe the T&R procedure was written during the days when you only had aging, basic assets in place (no advanced capability). Consider trace and recall protocols a step by step process guide to be used by who knows how many people in your extended organization once a food safety event occurs. Will all of the field operatives understand the language and complexity of what you’ve written? Will the procedures take into consideration both advanced and basic functions (such as code-dating and product identification)? Have you included the use of RFID into the process? Treat T&R as a process in need of continuous scrutiny and improvement.
4. HAZARD TYPES: Microbiological, Chemical and Physical
Has your HACCP team adequately and completely considered all three? When you did your assessment, you considered which of the three were more likely to occur. Consider that even though risk may appear to be low, it is not impossible.
As an example, due to what you’ve determined to be a low risk of occurrence, your facility does not choose to have production equipment, raw materials and finished product swabbed and tested for microbiological contamination. Following further review, the HACCP team is reminded that microorganisms can be brought into production areas through human contact, raw materials, packaging, multi-use accessories (pallets, trailers) and, as stated earlier, standing water, condensate etc. After careful consideration, the Team recommends a limited, yet practical microbiological testing protocol as a sensible alternative to inaction.
Chemical contamination may enter a supply chain from a variety of sources. Do you have a best practices chemical safety process in place? Do you test random samples and surfaces for chemical contamination? Do you test raw and pack materials for contamination from unwanted components, or do you rely on vendor’s Certificates of Analysis, Compliance and Composition? If you do not have an audit and analysis process in place, are you alternatively prepared to deal with consequences in the event of contamination? Do you evaluate recently manufactured product for unwanted or unexpected substances, odors or taste? Have you adequately assessed the potential for cross-contamination from internal and external sources?
Every process has risk for physical contamination from ancillary sources. Have you considered them all? Ceilings, walls, open windows, utilities, floors, refuse containers, containers in general, tools, exteriors, pallets and racks, equipment, humans, construction, maintenance and just about every other tangible item or process in, on or near production process and goods has the potential to facilitate consumer-level physical contamination. Have you included and evaluated each in your assessment forms? Are they documented in a schedule which includes team decisions on “likelihood of occurrence” and “degree of harm when occurring”? This is another continuous examination and analysis segment.
As in the prior mentioned examples, when unexplained, unexpected, under-considered or under-resourced events occur which threaten human safety, how have you prepared to quickly and effectively reach outside the organization for mutual aid, expert resources and functional assistance? Organizations, regardless of size, must have a plan to execute when the situation appear to be expanding or out of control. Once human health-related cases expand, you can be sure that regulatory authorities will demand answers as to how your organization intends eliminate the threat. Challenge your crisis team with mock incidents and exercises, the results of which are reviewed, “graded” and discussed as tools for continuous improvement.
These are but a few examples of how to challenge and stress-test your processes. But be advised, every function reading this column be you technical, operations, safety and quality, procurement and purchasing, warehousing, transportation and logistics or senior management, the safety of everything then flows through your hands is process-driven. Assume that all of your knowledge, experience and historical success may very well insulate you from a consumer-safety catastrophe. Now is the time to review, reconsider, rewire, adjust and continuously improve.
Gary Kestenbaum has 40 years’ experience in the food and packaging industries, six as a supplier with National Starch, 18 as a product developer with General/Kraft Foods and 15 as a packaging engineer and developer with Kraft. As senior food packaging safety consultant with EHA Consulting Group, Kestenbaum provides guidance on packaging safety and suitability-related projects for raw material manufacturers, converters and associated supporting professionals. He can be reached at [email protected] or 410-484-9133. The website is www.ehagroup.com.