New metal closures seal plastic food jars

William Makely

May 2, 2016

5 Min Read
New metal closures seal plastic food jars
New metal closures mate well with plastic containers used to package hot-filled or pasteurized foods.

Food companies wanting to switch from glass to PET packaging for hot-filled or pasteurized products can do so without sacrificing the consumer safety assurance of a metal vacuum closure—and without buying new capping equipment.

For decades, glass packaging has been the container of choice for a range of food products. In recent years—driven by demand from consumers and retailers to reduce weight and eliminate glass breakage—many brand owners began switching their food products from glass to plastic packaging, such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET).

Manufacturers of hot-filled products (such as pasta sauces and salsa) and products subject to pasteurization (such as pickles) may have wanted to make the glass-to-PET shift. But they felt compelled to continue to package their products in glass containers sealed with metal lug closures.

The reasons? Bottle and closure manufacturers were struggling to meet the multiple challenges involved in converting glass packaging to plastic and still having the container securely sealed with a metal closure. And brand owners were reluctant to make a change so dramatic that it would require a large investment in changing their filling/capping line equipment.

But the significant benefits offered by changing to plastic kept bottle manufacturers working closely with closure manufacturers to meet these challenges.

Glass packaging offers certain intrinsic advantages over plastics, such as rigidity and resistance to neck deformation during capping after high-heat operations like hot filling and before pasteurization. But glass also has limitations, including higher weight that raises logistics costs and susceptibility to breakage that can disrupt production line operations and create cleanup challenges for retailers.

The critical challenge for closure manufacturers was to create a metal closure that could seal the plastic container securely without deforming the heated and softened neck finish. A tight seal would let food companies provide the vacuum safety button that consumers preferred. For brand owners, it was also essential that any new container/closure combination maintain the same configuration that would allow it to be filled and capped on existing production equipment.

A new metal lug closure from Silgan Closures meets all of these challenges for PET packaging through two new patented designs: more and longer lugs, and a raised radius. The new closures may work with other plastics, but Silgan has tested them with PET so far.


1. More and longer lugs

Metal lug closures used with glass containers have traditionally used four lugs to connect the closure to the container neck and create a tight seal with flexible material within the closure. While this works successfully on rigid glass containers, the material of a PET container can become softened during the fill operation and, since the four-lug closure exerts pressure at four widely separate points, it can deform the neck, preventing a complete seal.

This new closure is designed to redistribute the pressure exerted on the neck of the PET container by increasing the number of lugs to at least five and increasing the length of each lug. This increases the closure’s physical contact with the neck by approximately 72%, which results in a more consistent pressure around the perimeter, preventing the neck from being deformed by unequal pressure.

Because the seal is now complete, the closure can incorporate a safety seal vacuum button that warns consumers when the seal has been broken. This is a critical package element for many consumers, and one long associated with the security of glass packaging.


2. Raised radius

The second new closure feature is a stepped radius design that stabilizes the container neck during exposure to heat from processes like pasteurization, where applicable.

PET containers have a thinner wall dimension than glass ones. In a traditional metal lug closure design, the channel in the closure into which the neck fits during sealing is larger than the PET neck thickness, and allows the neck to flex as a result of pressure. Silgan’s new design matches the width of the closure channel to the size of the PET neck, preventing flexing.

In the traditional lug closure, that channel is at the perimeter of the closure, where the skirt begins. In Silgan Closures’ new stepped design, beyond the new, thinner channel the closure top steps down to form the rounded skirt that contains the larger lugs. As the closure is applied, the neck is forced into the channel, which is lined with Silgan Closures’ proprietary Plastisol compound, which engages it and provides additional lateral stability, further preventing the neck from distorting as the closure is tightened.

As a result of these design changes, Silgan Closures now offers brand owners multiple closure choices: the traditional four-lug closure for use with glass, a closure with the traditional lug closure shape but more and larger lugs for use with PET, and the stepped closure design, also for use with PET, that includes the longer lugs. New designs are available in 63, 70 and 82 millimeter sizes.   

All of these closures meet a major requirement of most packagers: they can be applied with existing capping equipment.

PET container partners         

Three major PET container manufacturers––Amcor Rigid Plastics, Graham Packaging Co. and Plastipak Packaging––have each developed new PET food containers that meet the technical challenges presented by replacing glass jars with PET, including withstanding the high temperatures of hot filling, which can reach temperatures of 205-deg F., at which point PET softens.

While each company has developed its own material formulation and container design to strengthen the material and the rigidity of the container, all still faced the same closure dilemma. More heat-resistant formulations and stronger PET container designs still faced the extreme stresses that were applied by existing lug closures.

Consequently, each of these manufacturers independently worked closely with Silgan Closures’ engineers and designers as they developed the new closures, and each has incorporated, or is in the process of incorporating, a version of the new closure into its PET packaging.

As products in these packages reach retail shelves (soon!), sales will likely confirm earlier focus group tests that showed consumer acceptance—which, in turn, will likely lead more food companies to be comfortable with changing their glass packaging to PET.


William Makely has been a professional writer since 1985. He has published more than 700 articles about packaging materials and machinery.


See a host of new packaging products at EastPack 2016, June 14-16, in New York City.

Sign up for the Packaging Digest News & Insights newsletter.

You May Also Like